Man Angry, Man Rant: Fuck you Fiutak
Pete Fiutak of College Football News (CFN) fancies himself a sports writer and a bigger college football fan than you. Well, I disagree and I am mad about it.
In predicting that Michigan would start 1-3 this season, Pete wrote "Utah, Miami University and at Notre Dame are tougher non-conference foes than Appalachian State."
First an ad hominem attack, just for the hell of it: CFN is a horribly laid-out, spam-filled trash box of a website with more glitter than the Vegas Strip. It's god damned annoying to visit that filthy site, so I suggest that you don't. Also, don't visit prostitutes, you may get viruses.
Back to Pete, after one more ad hominem, his mind is a landfill of disinformation mixed with pygmy ritual. How stupid do you have to be to realize that the team Notre Damn had last year would have been demolished by Appy State? Michigan beat them 38-0, Michigan lost to Appalachian State. Put one and one together!
Miami University!?! They lost to Minnesota! Minnesota!!! The team who Rivals = Scout = CFN rated dead last in all the categories except jailed players in the Big 10. "This unit was an unmitigated disaster in 2007." Miami would have beaten Appy State? Get a clue!
Utah may or may not have beaten them last year. Although they did lose 3 of 4 to start the season, including being shutout by a UNLV team that went 2-10! So, this too is a stretch.
When you make statements like "Utah, Miami University and at Notre Dame are tougher non-conference foes than Appalachian State." at least do some research.
On a deeper level, (one that idiots like Fiutak cannot comprehend because their mind is more cluttered than red neck DNA) the comparison breaks down when you see that Michigan has a whole new team running a whole new scheme. If you'd argue that Michigan may not be prepared and Miami, Utah, Notre Damn, and Wisconsin may beat Michigan because they are experienced teams with retuning talent, then you'd have an argument.
It is a fallacy to compare this year's Michigan Opponents to last year's Appalachian State team and then pretend that Michigan lost to Appalachian State this year!
I still cannot get over the fact that he said that Notre Damn is tougher than Appalachian State when Michigan beat them 38-0! That's a skullfucking. Michigan got wasted by Oregon and were in total disarray and still pantsed the Irish. It's mind boggling how someone can publish this tripe and get away with it.
In predicting that Michigan would start 1-3 this season, Pete wrote "Utah, Miami University and at Notre Dame are tougher non-conference foes than Appalachian State."
First an ad hominem attack, just for the hell of it: CFN is a horribly laid-out, spam-filled trash box of a website with more glitter than the Vegas Strip. It's god damned annoying to visit that filthy site, so I suggest that you don't. Also, don't visit prostitutes, you may get viruses.
Back to Pete, after one more ad hominem, his mind is a landfill of disinformation mixed with pygmy ritual. How stupid do you have to be to realize that the team Notre Damn had last year would have been demolished by Appy State? Michigan beat them 38-0, Michigan lost to Appalachian State. Put one and one together!
Miami University!?! They lost to Minnesota! Minnesota!!! The team who Rivals = Scout = CFN rated dead last in all the categories except jailed players in the Big 10. "This unit was an unmitigated disaster in 2007." Miami would have beaten Appy State? Get a clue!
Utah may or may not have beaten them last year. Although they did lose 3 of 4 to start the season, including being shutout by a UNLV team that went 2-10! So, this too is a stretch.
When you make statements like "Utah, Miami University and at Notre Dame are tougher non-conference foes than Appalachian State." at least do some research.
On a deeper level, (one that idiots like Fiutak cannot comprehend because their mind is more cluttered than red neck DNA) the comparison breaks down when you see that Michigan has a whole new team running a whole new scheme. If you'd argue that Michigan may not be prepared and Miami, Utah, Notre Damn, and Wisconsin may beat Michigan because they are experienced teams with retuning talent, then you'd have an argument.
It is a fallacy to compare this year's Michigan Opponents to last year's Appalachian State team and then pretend that Michigan lost to Appalachian State this year!
I still cannot get over the fact that he said that Notre Damn is tougher than Appalachian State when Michigan beat them 38-0! That's a skullfucking. Michigan got wasted by Oregon and were in total disarray and still pantsed the Irish. It's mind boggling how someone can publish this tripe and get away with it.
Labels: idiot sportswriters, Man Angry, Man Rant
posted by Hemlock Philosopher at
12:48 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home